Determinants of an Effective Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Culture in Malaysian Public Listed Companies: A Literature-Based Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/mkwns727Keywords:
Anti-Bribery, Anti-Corruption, Corporate Governance, Section 17A MACC Act, Organizational Culture, Dual-Factor Model, MalaysiaAbstract
This paper integrates statutory provisions, regulatory guidance, corporate governance standards, and scholarly literature to ascertain the determinants of an effective anti-bribery and anti-corruption (ABAC) culture within Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs). The introduction of corporate liability via Section 17A of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 has catalyzed a shift from compliance-centric activities to a more profound examination of organizational culture. This study classifies the determinants of an effective ABAC culture into “hard” factors (legal, structural, and procedural) and “soft” factors (behavioral, cultural, and leadership). Drawing parallels from seminal management theories, this paper proposes a refined Dual-Factor ABAC Culture Model, which posits that while “hard” factors function as essential safeguards to prevent misconduct, “soft” factors are the primary drivers that cultivate a sustainable culture of integrity. The analysis culminates in a conceptual framework that integrates these cultural enablers with institutional safeguards, offering a governance-ready diagnostic instrument for PLCs, regulators, and practitioners aiming to embed integrity as a strategic asset.
References
[1]Anti-Corruption Governance and ESG Ratings-SustenyX. https://sustenyx.com/blog/anti-corruption-governance-and-esg-ratings/
[2]Malaysia: new corporate corruption liabilities | International Bar Association. https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail?ArticleUid=15BF75F2-55F1-4EAC-AD98-9C95FA6600F6
[3]Avoiding Corporate Criminal Liability for Corruption Offences-Skrine. https://www.skrine.com/Skrine/media/Assets/avoiding-corp-crmnl-liabty-Alert-230719.pdf
[4]Exploring Malaysian Business Undergraduates' Perceptions on Managing Corporate Corruption-Scientific & Academic Publishing. http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.c.economics.201501.08.html
[5]Corporate Liability Provision Under Section 17A MACC Act 2009 and Why It Matters to You. https://www.azmilaw.com/insights/corporate-liability-provision-under-section-17a-macc-act-2009-and-why-it-matters-to-you/
[6]Impact of MACC Act Section 17A on Organizations-ABAC Certification. https://abacgroup.com/macc-act-section-17a/
[7]Bailey, C. (2024). (PDF) Soft and Hard Models of Human Resource Management: A Reappraisal, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38176140_Soft_and_Hard_Models_of_Human_Resource_Management_A_Reappraisal
[8]Hard and Soft Controls-Mind the Gap | PDF | Business | Science. https://www.scribd.com/document/212898743/Hard-and-Soft-Controls-Mind-the-Gap
[9]Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance-Securities Commission. https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=239e5ea1-a258-4db8-a9e2-41c215bdb776
[10]Bogdanović, M. (n.d.). Finding the Appropriate Balance between Hard and Soft Management Principles: Filling the Gap to Resolve some Unsolved Management Problems. https://www.littera-scripta.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/3_Bogdanovic-1.pdf
[11]What is ISO 37001 and Why Every Construction Company Needs It for Compliance and Integrity? https://dr-iso.com.my/learn/what-is-iso-37001-and-why-every-construction-company-needs-it-for-compliance-and-integrity/
[12]Tone deaf at the top: encouraging top- down compliance in Asia Pacific companies | Clifford Chance. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2012/07/tone-deaf-at-the-top-encouraging-topdown-compliance-in-asia-pacific-companies.pdf
[13]Corporate Governance: Hard Facts about Soft Behaviors-Strategy and business. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/8322
[14]Corporate integrity as an antidote to corruption and sustenance of organizational development-Management and Accounting Review. https://mar.uitm.edu.my/images/Vol-14-2/06.pdf
[15]Corporate Liability: How can we prevent? https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/24219/corporate-liability-how-can-we-prevent.pdf
[16]ABC Policy-Eastspring Investments. https://www.eastspring.com/my/abc-policy
[17]Che Abu Bakar, M.A.O. and Mohamad Mangsor, M. (2022). It’s Not Enough to Speak, But to Speak True: Revisiting the Whistleblower Protection Law in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11), p.e001949.
[18]Two-factor theory-Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_theory
[19]Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory of Motivation-Hygiene. https://www.simplypsychology.org/herzbergs-two-factor-theory.html
[20]Herzberg's two-factor theory in project management-Wrike. https://www.wrike.com/blog/what-is-herzbergs-two-factor-theory/
[21]Job Satisfaction: Putting Theory into Practice | AAFP. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/fpm/issues/1999/1000/p26.html
[22]Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
[23]COSO (2013). Internal Control -Integrated Framework Executive Summary Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. https://www.coso.org/_files/ugd/3059fc_1df7d5dd38074006bce8fdf621a942cf.pdf
[24]Paine, L. (1994). Managing for Organizational Integrity. [online] Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1994/03/managing-for-organizational-integrity
[25]Treviño, L.K. and Brown, M.E. (2004). Managing to Be ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), pp.69-81.
[26]Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp.350-383.
[27]Schein, E.H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), p.677.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shaharin Abdul Samad (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
